If a woman erred inside her menstrual records, she might end right up which have intimate relations at the a forbidden date

Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi (latter half of the second and beginning of the third century C.E.), considered to be the redactor of the Codification of basic Jewish Oral Law; edited and arranged by R. Judah ha-Nasi c. 200 C.E. Mishnah , made a statement that started a trend of legal development resulting in the elimination of the category of normal menstruation and its replacement by the category of abnormal bleeding, ziva. His statement reflects the possible confusion in keeping track of one’s period, especially in light of the new system of pithei niddah. If this was done intentionally, the couple incurred the punishment of karet; if done unintentionally, they were obligated to bring a sin offering. Atonement by sacrifice, however, could not be made after the destruction of the Temple in the year 70 C.E. Great efforts were therefore made to prevent inadvertent sins of this nature. BT Niddah 66a gives us Rabbi’s statement: “R. Joseph citing Rav Judah who had it from Rav stated: Rabbi ordained at Sadot: If a woman observed a discharge on one day she must wait six days in addition to it. If she observed discharges on two days she must wait six days in addition to these. If she observed a discharge on three days she must wait seven clean days.”

Amoraim couldn’t disagreement tannaitic rulings versus tannaitic service nonetheless created fences around the Torah to end inadvertent sins

So it statement because of the Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi generally removed all of the menstruating ladies regarding regular monthly period category and you will place her or him regarding unpredictable updates out-of zava because most regular periods last at the very least three days. Frequently his matter is actually you to definitely because of the cutting-edge clarifications wanted to choose when you’re niddah and in case one may be a good zava, one to you’ll reach not work right which have grievous outcomes. Very first this new decree had limited effect; it looks for been regional, and may even was indeed limited by situations where NejlepЕЎГ­ gay weby question is inside and the regional society was not sufficiently learned to determine from inside the for example issues ( Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac; b. Certainly it was not a broad decree for everyone off Israel, nevertheless is actually the initial step in that assistance. In the 1st a couple advice, Rabbi’s declaration works closely with a woman which may be a small zava or possibly a beneficial niddah. She is managed in the first circumstances once the an effective niddah, with a beneficial 7-day period of impurity, in the place of 1 day from impurity during the day away from hemorrhaging, the code to possess a zava. Throughout the next example the woman is handled because a good niddah and a small zava if the first day had been within the this lady ziva period (the latest eleven days ranging from monthly period attacks). On 3rd condition, she’s addressed since the a whole zava. Most of the three rulings use the even more stringent position.

Troyes, France, 1040 Rashi )

Subsequent statements by other sages make it absolutely certain that it was understood to be a general ent are from the amoraim, the sages who created the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmudim. We find a aic) “spokesman.” Scholars active during the period from the completion of the Mishnah (c. 200 C.E.) until the completion of the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds (end of the fourth and fifth centuries respectively), who were active primarily in the interpretation of the Mishnah. In the chain of tradition they follow the tanna’im and precede the savora’im. amora Rav Huna in JT Berakhot (5:1, 8d): “Rav Huna said: One who sees a drop of blood like [the size of a] mustard seed sits and keeps [because of it] seven clean days. Afterwards he stood to pray.” The statement was made as an example of an undisputed law from which one could then turn to prayer. Such a law would clear one’s mind because there were no arguments about it, thereby allowing one to focus totally on prayer. Rav Huna’s statement is much more radical than the tannaitic version quoted above. According to him, all women who see uterine blood are in the category of the complete zava, regardless of the size of the blood stain and despite the normalcy of menstruation or having seen such blood only one or two days.